What Is Low Ad Relevance? A Complete Guide for Google Ads Advertisers

TL;DR: Low ad relevance is Google's way of telling you your ad copy doesn't match what people are actually searching for. It's one of three Quality Score components that directly impacts how much you pay per click and where your ads show up. When Google flags your ad relevance as "below average," you're essentially paying a premium for worse positions because your ad doesn't align with searcher intent. The good news? It's fixable with focused keyword grouping and ad copy adjustments—and this guide will show you exactly how.

If you've ever logged into Google Ads, checked your Quality Score, and seen that dreaded "below average" status next to ad relevance, you know the sinking feeling. Your ads are running, your budget is draining, but something's not clicking. That little red indicator isn't just a vanity metric—it's costing you real money on every single click.

Here's the thing most advertisers miss: low ad relevance creates a compounding problem. Higher costs lead to worse positions, which lead to fewer clicks, which make it even harder to improve your metrics. It's a negative feedback loop that can quietly drain thousands from your budget while you're focused on other optimizations.

This article breaks down exactly what low ad relevance means, why it matters more than most people realize, and—most importantly—how to fix it using tactics that actually work in real accounts. Think of this as your reference guide for understanding and improving one of the most overlooked levers in Google Ads performance.

The Quick Answer: Low Ad Relevance Explained

Low ad relevance means Google has determined your ad copy doesn't closely match the search terms triggering it. Simple as that. When someone types a query into Google, the algorithm evaluates whether your ad actually answers what they're looking for. If there's a mismatch, you get dinged.

This assessment is one of three components that make up your Quality Score. The other two are expected click-through rate (how likely people are to click your ad) and landing page experience (how relevant and useful your landing page is). All three work together to determine your overall Quality Score, which ranges from 1 to 10.

But here's what confuses people: while Quality Score itself is rated 1-10, ad relevance specifically shows up as one of three statuses in your account: below average, average, or above average. You won't see a numeric score for ad relevance alone—just this three-tier assessment compared to other advertisers competing for the same keywords.

Below average means your ad relevance is in the bottom tier compared to competitors. This is the red flag you want to fix immediately.

Average means you're in the middle of the pack. Not terrible, but there's definitely room for improvement—especially on high-spend keywords where small gains compound quickly.

Above average means your ad-to-keyword alignment is strong. This is where you want to be, particularly on your most important terms.

The critical thing to understand is that ad relevance isn't measuring whether your ad is "good" in some abstract sense. It's measuring alignment. Does your ad copy directly address the specific thing someone just searched for? If you're bidding on "blue running shoes" but your ad talks generically about "athletic footwear," that's a relevance problem—even if the ad itself is well-written.

In most accounts I audit, low ad relevance issues trace back to one of two problems: ad groups that are too broad (mixing unrelated keywords together) or ad copy that's too generic (not including the actual keywords people are searching). We'll dig into both scenarios and how to fix them throughout this guide.

Why Google Cares About Ad Relevance (And Why You Should Too)

Google's entire business model depends on people trusting search results—including ads. If searchers consistently click ads that don't match what they're looking for, they stop clicking ads altogether. That's bad for Google's revenue, so they've built their auction system to reward relevant ads and penalize irrelevant ones.

This isn't some abstract philosophy. It's baked directly into the Ad Rank formula, which determines both your ad position and how much you actually pay per click. The formula looks like this: Ad Rank = Max CPC Bid × Quality Score (plus other factors like ad extensions and context).

Notice that Quality Score is a multiplier. If your Quality Score is low because of poor ad relevance, you need a higher bid just to compete for the same positions as advertisers with better relevance. Let's say you're willing to bid $5 per click, but your Quality Score is 4 out of 10 due to low ad relevance. Meanwhile, your competitor bids $3 with a Quality Score of 8. Their Ad Rank is higher even though they're bidding less—and they'll pay less per click while showing above you.

This creates what I call the relevance tax. Every click costs you more than it should because Google is essentially penalizing you for serving ads that don't match searcher intent. Over hundreds or thousands of clicks, this adds up to real money—often thousands of dollars in wasted spend that could've been avoided with better keyword-to-ad alignment. Understanding what is causing high CPC in Google Ads often leads right back to relevance issues.

But it gets worse. Lower Ad Rank doesn't just mean higher costs—it also means worse positions. Your ads show up lower on the page, which means fewer people see them. Fewer impressions lead to fewer clicks, which makes it harder to gather the data you need to optimize other parts of your campaigns. You end up stuck in a negative feedback loop where poor relevance leads to bad positions, which leads to limited data, which makes it harder to improve relevance.

What usually happens here is advertisers see high CPCs and assume they need to bid higher to compete. They crank up their bids, which temporarily improves positions but doesn't fix the underlying relevance problem. Their costs stay high, and they never break out of the cycle.

The smarter move? Fix the relevance issue first. When you improve ad relevance, your Quality Score goes up, your Ad Rank improves, and you start paying less per click while maintaining or improving your positions. It's one of the few optimizations in Google Ads that simultaneously reduces costs and improves performance—if you do it right.

Common Causes of Low Ad Relevance

In most accounts I've worked with, low ad relevance isn't random. It follows predictable patterns. Understanding these common causes helps you diagnose problems faster and fix them more effectively.

Overstuffed ad groups. This is the number one culprit. You've got an ad group called "Running Shoes" with 40 different keywords: blue running shoes, women's running shoes, trail running shoes, cheap running shoes, Nike running shoes, and on and on. Your ad copy tries to be generic enough to cover all these variations, so it ends up saying something vague like "Shop Quality Running Shoes | Free Shipping." When someone searches "women's trail running shoes," your ad doesn't specifically address what they're looking for—even though the keyword is technically in your ad group.

Google sees this mismatch. The searcher wanted something specific (women's trail shoes), but your ad offered something generic (quality running shoes). That's a relevance problem, and it happens constantly in accounts with bloated ad groups.

Generic ad copy that doesn't include target keywords. Even if your ad groups are reasonably tight, generic headlines kill ad relevance. Let's say you're bidding on "PPC management software" but your ad headline is "Streamline Your Marketing Workflow." The ad might be compelling in isolation, but it doesn't include the actual phrase someone just searched for. Google flags this as low relevance because the searcher has to make a mental leap to connect their query with your ad.

The mistake most agencies make is writing ads that sound good in a vacuum without considering keyword alignment. They optimize for clever copy instead of search term matching. In reality, the best-performing ads are often straightforward and keyword-focused: "PPC Management Software | Automate Campaign Optimization" beats "Transform Your Marketing Performance" every time—not because it's more creative, but because it directly echoes what the searcher typed.

Mismatched search intent. This one's more subtle but equally damaging. You're bidding on keywords that trigger your ads, but the intent behind those searches doesn't match what you're offering. For example, you sell enterprise marketing software and you're bidding on "free marketing tools." Technically, you have marketing tools—but searchers using "free" in their query aren't looking for enterprise solutions. Your ad shows up, gets ignored or quickly bounced, and Google learns that your ad isn't relevant to that search intent.

What usually happens here is advertisers see decent search volume on broad terms and add them to campaigns without thinking through intent. Someone searching "how to do keyword research" is in learning mode, not buying mode. If your ad pushes a paid tool, that's an intent mismatch—even if keyword research is exactly what your product does. This is where understanding what is a search term becomes critical for campaign success.

Another common scenario: bidding on competitor terms without adjusting ad copy. You bid on "Competitor Name alternative" but your ad doesn't acknowledge you're positioning as an alternative—it just describes your product generically. The searcher was specifically looking for alternatives to that competitor, but your ad doesn't address that intent directly.

The pattern across all these causes is the same: there's a gap between what searchers are looking for and what your ad is communicating. Google's algorithm is designed to detect these gaps and penalize them. The fix isn't complicated, but it does require rethinking how you structure campaigns and write ad copy—which is exactly what we'll cover in the next sections.

How to Diagnose Ad Relevance Issues in Your Account

Before you can fix low ad relevance, you need to identify where it's actually happening. Google Ads gives you the tools to do this, but most advertisers don't know where to look or how to interpret what they're seeing.

Start by adding Quality Score columns to your keywords view. In the Google Ads interface, navigate to your Keywords tab, click the Columns icon, then select "Modify columns." Under the "Quality Score" section, add these columns: Quality Score, Landing Page Exp., Exp. CTR, and Ad Relevance. These show you the overall Quality Score (1-10) plus the three individual components (each rated as below average, average, or above average).

Once you've added these columns, sort your keywords by the Ad Relevance column. Look for any keywords showing "Below average" status—these are your problem children. In a typical account, you'll find that 10-30% of keywords have below average ad relevance, depending on how the account is structured.

Now here's the important part: don't just look at ad relevance in isolation. Cross-reference it with spend data. Add a Cost column and sort by highest spend first, then scan for any high-spend keywords with below average ad relevance. These are your priority fixes. A keyword spending $5/day with low relevance isn't as urgent as one spending $200/day with the same issue.

Next, dig into the Search Terms Report. This shows you the actual queries triggering your ads, not just the keywords you're bidding on. Navigate to Search Terms under the Keywords section, and look for patterns. Are there search queries triggering your ads that don't closely match your ad copy? For example, if you're bidding on "email marketing software" and you see queries like "free email marketing templates" triggering your ads, that's a relevance mismatch—even if your keyword match type technically allows it.

Pay special attention to broad match and phrase match keywords. These match types give Google more flexibility in when your ads show up, which means higher risk of relevance mismatches. If you see a broad match keyword triggering ads on loosely related queries, that's likely contributing to low ad relevance scores. Understanding match type optimization is essential for controlling these relevance issues.

Another diagnostic technique: check which ads are serving for your low-relevance keywords. Click through to the ad group level and look at the ad copy. Does the headline or description include the actual keyword that's flagged for low relevance? If not, you've found your problem. In most accounts I audit, the issue is obvious once you look at the keyword and the ad side by side—they just don't align.

One more thing to check: look at your ad group structure. How many keywords are in each ad group? If you're seeing numbers like 30, 40, or 50+ keywords per ad group, that's almost always the root cause of low ad relevance. It's nearly impossible to write ad copy that's relevant to 50 different keywords, so Google flags the mismatches.

The diagnosis process should take 15-30 minutes for a typical account. You're looking for patterns: which keywords have low relevance, how much are they spending, what search terms are triggering them, and does the ad copy actually match those terms? Once you've identified the problem areas, you can move on to the fixes.

Practical Fixes That Actually Work

Diagnosing low ad relevance is one thing. Fixing it requires actual changes to your account structure and ad copy. Here are the tactics that consistently improve ad relevance in real accounts.

Restructure ad groups around tighter keyword themes. This is the most impactful fix, but also the most work. Take those bloated ad groups with 30-50 keywords and break them down into smaller, tightly themed groups. Instead of one "Running Shoes" ad group, create separate ad groups for "Women's Running Shoes," "Men's Running Shoes," "Trail Running Shoes," and "Road Running Shoes." Each ad group should contain 5-15 closely related keywords—or even just one keyword in multiple match types if you want maximum relevance. This approach is fundamental to keyword optimization in Google Ads.

Yes, this means more ad groups and more ads to manage. But the relevance improvement is worth it. When your ad group only contains keywords about women's running shoes, you can write ad copy that specifically addresses women's running shoes. Google sees the tight alignment between keywords and ads, and your ad relevance scores improve.

Some advertisers take this even further with single keyword ad groups (SKAGs), where each ad group contains just one keyword in multiple match types. This gives you maximum control and relevance, though it can get tedious to manage at scale. A middle ground that works well: group 3-5 very similar keywords together (like "buy running shoes," "purchase running shoes," "order running shoes") and write ads specifically for that micro-theme.

Rewrite headlines to include exact or close keyword variants. Once your ad groups are tightened up, rewrite your ad headlines to include the actual keywords you're targeting. If your ad group is focused on "PPC management software," your first headline should be something like "PPC Management Software" or "Automate PPC Management." Don't get cute with it—use the actual phrase searchers are typing.

Google's responsive search ads let you test up to 15 headlines, so use that flexibility. Include your main keyword in at least 2-3 headline variations, then add supporting headlines that address benefits, features, or differentiators. The key is making sure Google can always show at least one headline that directly matches the search query.

For descriptions, follow the same principle. Reference the keyword or closely related terms in your description copy. If you're targeting "email marketing automation," your description might say something like "Automate your email marketing campaigns with powerful workflows and segmentation." The phrase "email marketing" appears twice, reinforcing relevance.

Use responsive search ads strategically. Responsive search ads (RSAs) are Google's current default ad format, and they're actually helpful for improving ad relevance—if you use them right. The algorithm tests different combinations of your headlines and descriptions to find what works best for different queries.

Here's the strategy: include your main keyword in multiple headline positions, but pin one keyword-focused headline to position 1. This ensures that headline always shows, giving you consistent relevance. Then let Google mix and match your other headlines and descriptions to optimize for CTR and conversions.

For example, if you're targeting "project management software," you might pin "Project Management Software" to headline position 1, then add variations like "Streamline Team Collaboration," "Free Trial Available," and "Used by 10,000+ Teams" in unpinned positions. Google will always show your keyword-focused headline while testing different combinations of the others.

The mistake I see most often with RSAs is advertisers write 15 generic headlines that don't include keywords, then wonder why their ad relevance stays low. RSAs aren't magic—they still need keyword-focused copy to work properly.

Adjust match types to control relevance. If you're using broad match keywords and seeing low ad relevance, consider tightening to phrase match or exact match. Broad match gives Google a lot of flexibility in when your ads show, which often leads to relevance mismatches. Phrase and exact match keep your ads closer to your intended keywords, which improves alignment with your ad copy.

That said, don't abandon broad match entirely—it's useful for discovery. Instead, use it selectively on your most important keywords where you can afford to monitor search terms closely and add negatives aggressively. For everything else, phrase and exact match will give you better relevance scores with less ongoing management.

One more tactic that works: use keyword insertion in headlines when appropriate. Dynamic keyword insertion (DKI) automatically inserts the searcher's query into your ad headline if it matches one of your keywords. This creates perfect relevance alignment—though you need to be careful with capitalization and character limits. It's most effective in tightly themed ad groups where all keywords are closely related.

Putting It All Together: Your Ad Relevance Action Plan

Improving ad relevance isn't a one-time fix—it's an ongoing process of alignment between what people search for and what your ads communicate. But you don't need to overhaul your entire account at once. Start with the highest-impact opportunities and work your way down.

Here's your action plan in scannable steps:

Week 1: Audit and prioritize. Add Quality Score columns to your keywords view. Identify all keywords with below average ad relevance. Sort by spend to find your highest-cost problem keywords. These are your priority fixes.

Week 2: Fix high-spend keywords first. For your top 10-20 highest-spend keywords with low relevance, check which ad groups they're in. Are the ad groups too broad? Does the ad copy include the keyword? If not, either move the keyword to a more relevant ad group or create a new tightly themed ad group for it.

Week 3: Rewrite ad copy. For each ad group you touched in week 2, rewrite your ads to include the target keywords in headlines. Use responsive search ads with at least 2-3 keyword-focused headlines. Make sure descriptions also reference the keywords naturally.

Week 4: Monitor and expand. Check your ad relevance scores again. You should see improvements on the keywords you fixed—though it may take a few days for Google's algorithm to update the scores. Once you've confirmed improvements, repeat the process with your next tier of keywords.

The key insight here is that small improvements compound over time. Fixing ad relevance on a keyword spending $100/day might save you $20-30/day in reduced CPCs while improving your average position. Multiply that across 10 or 20 keywords, and you're looking at hundreds of dollars in daily savings—plus better performance from improved positions and click-through rates. For a deeper dive into cost reduction tactics, explore how to lower CPC in Google Ads.

Remember: ad relevance is a relative metric. Google compares your ads to competitors bidding on the same keywords. Even if you improve from below average to average, you're still leaving money on the table. The goal is to push as many keywords as possible into above average status, especially on your highest-value terms.

One final point: don't obsess over every single keyword's ad relevance score. Focus on the ones that matter—high spend, high conversion value, or strategic importance to your business. A low-volume keyword with below average ad relevance isn't worth hours of optimization if it only drives a few clicks per month. Prioritize ruthlessly based on actual business impact.

Your Next Step: Stop Losing Money to Low Ad Relevance

Low ad relevance is one of those problems that quietly drains your budget while you're focused on other optimizations. The good news? It's completely fixable with focused effort on keyword-to-ad alignment. You don't need advanced tools or complex strategies—just tighter ad groups, keyword-focused headlines, and consistent monitoring.

The fixes we've covered in this guide work. I've used them in dozens of accounts to improve Quality Scores, reduce CPCs, and boost overall campaign performance. The pattern is consistent: when you align your ads more closely with what people are actually searching for, Google rewards you with better positions and lower costs. It's one of the few optimizations that simultaneously improves performance and reduces spend.

Start small. Pick your top 10 highest-spend keywords with below average ad relevance and fix them this week. Check their ad group structure, rewrite the ad copy to include those keywords, and monitor the results. You'll likely see improvements within a few days—and those improvements will compound as you expand the process to more keywords.

But here's the reality: fixing ad relevance is just one part of ongoing Google Ads optimization. You also need to manage negative keywords in Google Ads, refine match types, analyze search terms, and adjust bids—all of which take time away from strategic work. If you're spending hours each week on manual optimization tasks, there's a better way.

Start your free 7-day trial of Keywordme and optimize Google Ads campaigns 10X faster—without leaving your account. Remove junk search terms with one click, build high-intent keyword lists instantly, and apply match types directly in the Google Ads interface. No spreadsheets, no tab-switching, just quick, seamless optimization that lets you focus on strategy instead of tedious manual work. After your trial, it's just $12/month to keep the efficiency going. Take your Google Ads game to the next level.