7 Proven Strategies for Writing Phrase vs Exact Match Negatives in Google Ads

TL;DR: Phrase match negatives block queries containing your keyword phrase in that exact word order, while exact match negatives only block the precise query you specify. Choose wrong and you'll either waste budget on junk clicks or accidentally block legitimate traffic. Most advertisers stick to one match type by default without understanding when each works best—leading to over-blocking that kills good searches or under-blocking that hemorrhages spend. This guide breaks down seven proven strategies to help you make the right call every time, whether you're cleaning up one campaign or managing hundreds.

Here's the thing: negative keywords are where most Google Ads optimizations actually happen. You can have brilliant ad copy and perfect landing pages, but if you're showing up for "free alternatives to [your product]" or "[your service] DIY tutorial," you're burning money on clicks that will never convert.

The challenge? The match type you choose determines whether you're using a scalpel or a sledgehammer. And unlike positive keywords, negative keywords don't include close variants—what you block is exactly what gets blocked, nothing more. That precision is powerful, but it also means one wrong decision can have ripple effects across your entire account.

Let's walk through the exact framework professional PPC managers use to make these decisions quickly and confidently.

1. Understand the Fundamental Blocking Difference

The Challenge It Solves

Most advertisers learn about match types for positive keywords but never dig into how negatives work differently. This knowledge gap leads to blocking decisions based on gut feeling rather than mechanics—and gut feelings don't scale when you're managing thousands of search terms across multiple campaigns.

The confusion gets worse because Google's documentation treats negative match types almost as an afterthought. You need to understand exactly what each match type blocks before you can make strategic decisions about which one to use.

The Strategy Explained

Think of exact match negatives as a sniper rifle—they eliminate one specific target and nothing else. If you add "red shoes" as an exact match negative, you'll block someone searching for exactly "red shoes" but still show up for "red running shoes," "buy red shoes," or "red shoes sale."

Phrase match negatives work like a fence around a specific phrase. Add "red shoes" as phrase match and you'll block any query containing those two words in that exact order: "red shoes," "buy red shoes," "red shoes for men." But you'd still show up for "shoes red" or "red running shoes" because the word order changed or another word interrupted the phrase.

Broad match negatives cast the widest net—they block any query containing all your negative keyword terms in any order or combination. Add "red shoes" as broad match and you'll block "red shoes," "shoes that are red," "red running shoes," and even "shoes for red carpet events." This is why broad match negatives often over-block.

The critical insight: negative keywords don't expand to close variants like positive keywords do. If you block "running shoes," you won't automatically block "runners shoes" or "jogging shoes." What you specify is what gets blocked, period.

Implementation Steps

1. Pull up your current negative keyword list and identify which match types you're actually using—most accounts default to one type without realizing it.

2. For each negative keyword, ask yourself: "Do I want to block this exact query only, any query containing this phrase in order, or any query containing these words in any order?"

3. Test your understanding by writing out 3-4 example queries for each negative and determining whether your chosen match type would block them.

Pro Tips

Create a reference document with real examples from your account showing what each match type blocks. When training team members or making quick decisions during optimization sessions, having concrete examples beats abstract definitions every time. Most blocking mistakes happen because people forget the subtle differences under pressure.

2. Start With the 'Damage Assessment' Method

The Challenge It Solves

When you spot an irrelevant search term in your report, the immediate reaction is to block it and move on. But that knee-jerk response often leads to choosing the wrong match type because you're focused on the single bad query in front of you, not the pattern it represents.

You need a systematic way to evaluate whether a term is a one-off problem (exact match solution) or the tip of an iceberg (phrase match solution). Making this assessment consistently prevents both wasted spend from under-blocking and lost opportunities from over-blocking.

The Strategy Explained

The damage assessment method starts by asking: "How many variations of this bad search term am I likely to encounter?" If someone searched for "free accounting software" and you're selling premium accounting software, that's not just one bad query—it's a signal that you'll probably also see "free accounting tools," "free accounting app," "accounting software free trial," and dozens of similar variations.

When you identify a pattern rather than an isolated incident, phrase match becomes your friend. But if the search term is only problematic in its exact form—like "accounting" triggering your "accounting software" campaign when you don't want to show up for the standalone word—then exact match gives you surgical precision without collateral damage.

The key is looking at your search terms report with pattern recognition, not just term-by-term blocking. Scan for clusters of similar irrelevant queries. If you see three variations of the same bad intent, you're dealing with a pattern that needs phrase match treatment.

Implementation Steps

1. When reviewing search terms, don't add negatives one at a time—batch them by similarity first and look for patterns across your report.

2. For each bad search term, ask: "Have I seen variations of this before?" and "Am I likely to see more variations in the future?"

3. If yes to either question, default to phrase match. If it's truly a unique, context-specific query, use exact match.

4. Document your reasoning in a shared spreadsheet so team members can learn from past decisions and maintain consistency.

Pro Tips

Set up a simple tagging system in your negative keyword list: tag phrase match negatives with [PATTERN] and exact match with [SURGICAL]. This creates a visual reminder of your strategic intent and makes it easier to audit your list later. When you revisit negatives months later, you'll understand why you made each decision instead of second-guessing yourself.

3. Apply the 'Root Word' Test for Phrase Match Candidates

The Challenge It Solves

Some words are universally irrelevant to your business regardless of what other words surround them. If you're a B2B SaaS company, any query containing "free" is probably a waste of money. If you're a premium service provider, "cheap" signals the wrong customer intent. But adding these as exact match means you'd need hundreds of negative keywords to catch all the variations.

The root word test helps you identify terms that warrant aggressive, phrase match blocking because they represent fundamentally incompatible intent—not just slightly off-target searches.

The Strategy Explained

A root word is a term that poisons any query it appears in, regardless of context. For e-commerce sellers, "DIY" is often a root word—whether someone searches "DIY phone repair," "DIY phone case," or "best DIY phone accessories," they're signaling they want to do it themselves, not buy your product.

The test is simple: if you can't imagine a scenario where a query containing this word would be relevant to your business, it's a phrase match candidate. "Free," "jobs," "careers," "DIY," "homemade," "used," "rental"—these are common root words that many businesses should block broadly.

But be careful with words that seem obviously bad but actually have legitimate uses. "Cheap" might seem like a universal negative, but if you sell budget-friendly products and "cheap" is actually your positioning, blocking it as phrase match would be disastrous. Context matters, which is why this test requires knowing your business model inside and out.

Implementation Steps

1. List 10-15 words that represent fundamentally wrong intent for your business—think about price signals (free, cheap), intent signals (DIY, tutorial, guide), and audience signals (jobs, careers, schools).

2. For each word, write out 5 example queries containing that word and honestly assess whether ANY of them could be legitimate searches for your product or service.

3. If all examples are irrelevant, add the word as a phrase match negative at the account level so it applies everywhere.

4. Schedule a quarterly review to reassess these root word negatives—your business positioning might change, making previously irrelevant terms suddenly valuable.

Pro Tips

Create separate negative keyword lists for different root word categories: one for price-related terms, one for wrong-audience terms, one for informational intent. This organization makes it easier to apply the right list to the right campaigns and prevents accidentally blocking terms that might be relevant in specific campaign contexts. An account-wide "free" block might hurt your free trial campaign, for example.

4. Use Exact Match for High-Volume, Context-Dependent Terms

The Challenge It Solves

Some search terms are only problematic in very specific forms. Block them too broadly and you'll eliminate legitimate traffic that's actually driving conversions. This is where most over-blocking happens—advertisers see one bad query, panic, and add a phrase match negative that accidentally kills dozens of good searches.

The classic example: you're advertising "project management software" and see someone searched just "project management" (without "software"), clicking your ad but not converting because they wanted general information, not a tool. Your instinct might be to add "project management" as a phrase match negative—but that would also block "best project management software," "project management software for teams," and every other valuable query containing those words.

The Strategy Explained

Exact match negatives are your precision tool for queries that are bad in isolation but good when combined with other words. They let you block "project management" while still showing up for "project management software," "project management tools," and "project management platform."

This strategy works best for broad industry terms that trigger your ads but don't include your product category. Someone searching "email marketing" might want general information, but "email marketing software" signals buying intent. Someone searching "analytics" is too vague, but "analytics dashboard" or "analytics tool" shows clear product interest.

The key is recognizing when a term is context-dependent rather than universally bad. If adding one or two qualifying words would make the query relevant, use exact match. If no combination of additional words would make it relevant, use phrase match.

Implementation Steps

1. Review your search terms report and identify broad, one or two-word queries that triggered impressions but didn't convert well.

2. For each term, test whether adding qualifying words would make it relevant—mentally add "software," "tool," "platform," "service," or "buy" to the query.

3. If the modified versions would be valuable searches, add the original term as an exact match negative only.

4. Monitor your impression volume after adding these negatives—if you see a significant drop in total impressions (not just for that exact query), you may have accidentally blocked close variants and need to investigate.

Pro Tips

Keep a running list of your exact match negatives with notes about why you blocked them and what good queries you're protecting. This documentation becomes invaluable when you're troubleshooting impression drops or training new team members. It's also useful when you expand to new campaigns—you'll remember that "project management" needs exact match blocking across all your campaigns, not just the first one where you discovered the issue.

5. Create a Tiered Negative Keyword Structure

The Challenge It Solves

Most advertisers dump all their negative keywords at the campaign level without thinking about whether that's the right place for them. This creates two problems: you end up managing massive, unwieldy negative lists that are hard to audit, and you apply negatives too broadly or too narrowly because you're not thinking strategically about where blocking should happen.

A tiered structure solves this by matching the scope of your negative keywords to the scope of the problem they're solving. Some terms should be blocked everywhere (account level), some only in specific campaigns (campaign level), and some only in targeted ad groups (ad group level).

The Strategy Explained

Think of your negative keyword structure as concentric circles, each with different blocking priorities. At the account level, you have universal negatives—terms that are never relevant to your business, like "free" for a premium B2B product or "jobs" for a service provider. These are typically phrase match negatives based on root words that represent fundamentally wrong intent.

At the campaign level, you have context-specific negatives that make sense for one campaign type but not others. If you're running separate campaigns for "enterprise" and "small business" solutions, you'd add "small business" as a negative in your enterprise campaign and "enterprise" as a negative in your small business campaign. These are often exact match negatives because the terms themselves aren't bad—they're just wrong for this specific campaign.

At the ad group level, you have surgical negatives that prevent keyword cannibalization within a campaign. If one ad group targets "email marketing software" and another targets "email automation software," you might add "automation" as an exact match negative in the first ad group to ensure clean traffic segmentation.

Implementation Steps

1. Create three separate negative keyword lists in Google Ads: "Account-Wide Negatives," "Campaign-Specific Negatives," and "Ad Group Negatives."

2. Audit your existing negatives and categorize each one by asking: "Should this be blocked everywhere, just in certain campaigns, or only in specific ad groups?"

3. Move account-wide negatives (usually phrase match root words) to a shared list that applies to all campaigns automatically.

4. Keep campaign-specific negatives at the campaign level, and document why they're specific to that campaign so future optimizers understand the logic.

5. Use ad group negatives sparingly and only when you need to prevent overlap between tightly related ad groups in the same campaign.

Pro Tips

Name your negative keyword lists descriptively: instead of "Negative List 1," use "Universal Negatives - Price Seekers" or "Enterprise Campaign - SMB Terms." This makes it immediately obvious what each list does and prevents accidentally applying the wrong list to the wrong campaign. When you're managing dozens of campaigns, clear naming conventions are the difference between efficient optimization and chaos.

6. Audit for Over-Blocking With the Impression Test

The Challenge It Solves

Here's the problem nobody talks about: negative keywords can kill your campaigns if you're too aggressive. Over-blocking is invisible—you don't see the good traffic you're accidentally preventing, you just see declining performance and wonder what happened. By the time you realize a phrase match negative is blocking legitimate searches, you may have lost weeks or months of potential conversions.

The impression test helps you identify negatives that are working too well—blocking not just junk traffic but also valuable queries you actually want.

The Strategy Explained

The concept is simple: if you add a negative keyword and your total impressions drop by more than the impressions that specific term was generating, you're blocking more than you intended. This usually happens with phrase match negatives that contain words that also appear in your positive keywords.

Let's say you're advertising "social media management software" and you add "social media" as a phrase match negative because you saw some irrelevant queries containing those words. Suddenly, your impressions crater—because "social media" appears in your main keyword, and phrase match negatives block any query containing that phrase, including the ones you're actively bidding on.

The impression test catches these mistakes by comparing impression volume before and after adding negatives. A healthy negative keyword should reduce impressions by roughly the amount that specific term was generating, plus some related variations. If impressions drop dramatically more than expected, you've over-blocked.

Implementation Steps

1. Before adding any phrase match negative, note your current 7-day impression volume for the campaign or ad group where you're adding it.

2. Add the negative keyword and wait 7 days for data to stabilize.

3. Compare new impression volume to your baseline—calculate the percentage drop.

4. If impressions dropped by more than 20% and the negative term wasn't generating that much traffic, investigate whether you're blocking legitimate queries.

5. Check if any of your positive keywords contain words from your negative keyword—this is the most common cause of over-blocking.

Pro Tips

Set up a simple spreadsheet to track negative keywords you add, the date you added them, and the impression change you observed. This creates a historical record that helps you identify patterns in your blocking decisions and quickly troubleshoot when performance drops unexpectedly. Many advertisers add dozens of negatives over weeks or months and then can't figure out which one caused an impression drop—don't be that advertiser.

7. Build a Decision Framework You Can Repeat

The Challenge It Solves

The biggest obstacle to effective negative keyword management isn't knowledge—it's consistency. You might make the right decision today, but will you make the same decision next week when you're rushed? Will your team member make the same decision when they're optimizing a different campaign? Without a repeatable framework, every negative keyword becomes a judgment call, and judgment calls don't scale.

A decision framework turns negative keyword optimization from an art into a system. It ensures that you and your team make consistent, defensible decisions every time, regardless of who's doing the optimization or how much time pressure they're under.

The Strategy Explained

Your framework should be a simple flowchart that anyone can follow. Start with the fundamental question: "Is this term ALWAYS irrelevant to my business?" If yes, it's a phrase match candidate—add it and move on. If no, ask the next question: "Is this term only bad in this exact form?" If yes, use exact match. If no, you probably don't need to block it at all.

The framework should also specify where to add the negative: "Does this apply to all campaigns?" → Account level. "Does this apply to just this campaign type?" → Campaign level. "Does this only prevent overlap in this ad group?" → Ad group level.

Document your framework with real examples from your account. Instead of abstract rules, show actual search terms you've encountered and how you applied the framework to make decisions. This turns your framework from theory into a practical tool that team members can reference when they're unsure.

Implementation Steps

1. Create a one-page decision tree with clear yes/no questions that lead to specific match type and placement recommendations.

2. Test your framework by applying it to 20 recent search terms from your report—does it consistently lead to the same decisions you'd make manually?

3. Refine the questions based on edge cases you discover during testing—add clarifying questions or examples where the framework breaks down.

4. Share the framework with your team and require everyone to reference it for the first month until the decision process becomes automatic.

5. Schedule quarterly reviews to update the framework based on new patterns or business changes—your framework should evolve as your campaigns mature.

Pro Tips

Include a "when in doubt" rule in your framework: if you're genuinely unsure whether a term should be exact or phrase match, default to exact match and monitor for variations. It's easier to expand blocking than to fix over-blocking. This conservative approach prevents the most common mistake—adding phrase match negatives too quickly and accidentally killing good traffic you didn't know you were getting.

Putting It All Together: Your Implementation Roadmap

The difference between advertisers who consistently improve their Google Ads performance and those who plateau comes down to treating negative keywords as an ongoing optimization task, not a one-time setup. The strategies above give you a systematic approach to making phrase vs exact match decisions quickly and confidently.

Start by auditing your existing negative keyword lists using the impression test—identify any phrase match negatives that might be over-blocking and convert them to exact match where appropriate. Then implement the tiered structure so you're applying negatives at the right level (account, campaign, or ad group) based on their scope.

As you review search terms going forward, use the damage assessment method and root word test to determine match types systematically. Build out your decision framework and document your reasoning so your entire team can make consistent choices without constant supervision.

The real power of this approach is that it compounds over time. Each negative keyword decision you make improves your targeting, reduces wasted spend, and creates a cleaner data set for future optimization. Within a few months, you'll have a negative keyword structure that automatically filters out junk traffic while protecting the valuable searches that drive conversions.

Tools like Keywordme can dramatically speed up this workflow by letting you make these decisions directly in the Google Ads search terms report—no switching tabs, no spreadsheets, just quick clicks to add negatives with the right match type in the right place. When you're reviewing hundreds of search terms, that efficiency matters.

The bottom line: phrase match negatives are your pattern-blocking tool for universally irrelevant terms, while exact match negatives give you surgical precision for context-dependent queries. Master when to use each, build a repeatable system for making these decisions, and audit regularly to catch over-blocking before it kills your performance.

Optimize Google Ads Campaigns 10X Faster—Without Leaving Your Account. Keywordme lets you remove junk search terms, build high-intent keyword groups, and apply match types instantly—right inside Google Ads. No spreadsheets, no switching tabs, just quick, seamless optimization. Manage one campaign or hundreds and save hours while making smarter decisions. Start your free 7-day trial (then just $12/month) and take your Google Ads game to the next level.